Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(2)
This conclusion was based on evidence that: (i) unhelpful RT is characterized by an abstract level of processing and (ii) manipulating level of goal/action identification influenced the consequences of RT (see Watkins, 2008).
Level of goal/action identification influenced emotional recovery from the failure: At higher levels of trait rumination, levels of negative mood 12 h after the failure were greater, but only in individuals who wrote abstractly and not in individuals who wrote concretely.
Similar(58)
This identification influences their attitudes toward stereotyped tasks (Nosek et al., 2002).
The literature on craving is also consistent with level of goal/action identification influencing impulsive appetitive behaviors.
Second, there is evidence that level of goal/action identification influences symptoms and processes involved in psychological disorders.
There is evidence that level of goal/action identification influences the emotional response to stressful and negative situations.
First, experimentally manipulating level of goal/action identification influences emotional response to a subsequent anagram stress failure task (Moberly & Watkins, 2006; Watkins et al., 2008).
Thus, there is evidence that level of goal/action identification influences whether RT has constructive or unconstructive consequences and whether it becomes pathological.
Third, experimentally manipulating level of goal/action identification influences emotional response to a subsequent stress failure task (Moberly & Watkins, 2006; Watkins et al., 2008), with more concrete identifications resulting in less emotional reactivity.
For example, it has been suggested that identification influences the perception of the odor or makes it more meaningful that ultimately result in better memory performance (de Wijk et al. 1995).
Experimental manipulations of level of goal/action identification influence emotional response to failure, the consequences of repetitive thought, delay of gratification and resistance to temptation, problem solving, and procrastination.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com