identical as for

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "identical as for" is not correct in standard written English.
It seems to be an attempt to compare or equate two things, but the structure is awkward and unclear. Example: "The results were identical as for the previous experiment." (This would be better phrased.)

⚠ May contain grammatical issues

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

10 human-written examples

The postsurgical care was identical as for the first-stage procedure.

EJNMMI Research

Sections for this purpose were incubated for 1 h with the rabbit polyclonal anti-caspase-3 antibody at room temperature and were visualized with Dako EnVision+System-HRP (Dako K 4010, Dako A/S, Glostrup, Denmark), while further procedures were identical as for PCNA detection.

Nanoscale Research Letters

The balloon technique was identical as for esophageal stent placement.

Plosone

Otherwise the procedure and stimulus presentations were identical as for the NF condition.

Behavioral and Brain Functions

The imaging conditions were kept identical as for the apo-state data.

eLife

After informed consent has been obtained, the diagnostic procedures applied to the controls are identical as for the cases.

BMC Infectious Diseases

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

50 human-written examples

Tissues related to the latter two functions could be similar in different organs but not identical, as known for the endothelial surfaces.

F1000Research

If the two atoms are identical, as in, for example, the oxygen molecule (O2), they compose a homonuclear diatomic molecule, while if the atoms are different, as in the carbon monoxide molecule (CO), they make up a heteronuclear diatomic molecule.

Encyclopedia Britannica

Criteria to prevent aliasing in higher order frequency domains are not exactly identical as that for the power spectrum because of the multiple frequency dimensions, and the interested reader is referred to [24 26].

EURASIP Journal on Advances in Signal Processing

The results are almost identical as before except for the slight changes in P-values (see details in supplementary materials).

BMC Genomics

The sampling interval and analytical procedures were identical as those for the Rayonet reactor experiment.

Chemistry Central Journal

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Avoid using the phrase "identical as for" in formal writing. Opt for clearer and grammatically correct alternatives like "identical to" or "the same as".

Common error

Using "as for" after "identical" is grammatically incorrect. The correct preposition to use with "identical" is "to". Always use "identical to" to maintain grammatical accuracy.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "identical as for" attempts to function as a comparative expression, aiming to equate two entities or processes. However, it's non-standard and grammatically incorrect. Ludwig AI highlights the need for more precise and accepted alternatives, such as "identical to".

Expression frequency: Uncommon

Frequent in

Science

100%

Less common in

News & Media

0%

Formal & Business

0%

Encyclopedias

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "identical as for" is grammatically incorrect. While Ludwig AI shows some instances of its usage, primarily in scientific contexts, standard English grammar recommends using "identical to" or "the same as" instead. This ensures clarity and correctness in writing. Despite occasional appearances in various sources, its non-standard nature suggests avoiding it in formal or academic writing. Therefore, always opt for grammatically sound alternatives to convey your intended meaning accurately.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

identical to

This alternative uses the correct preposition to indicate equivalence or sameness.

the same as

This is a common and grammatically sound way to express similarity or equivalence.

equal to

Indicates that the items being compared have the same value or measure.

equivalent to

Implies a functional or practical sameness between two things.

as identical as

Emphasizes the degree of similarity, suggesting a very close match.

indistinguishable from

Highlights that there is no discernible difference between the items.

matches exactly

Focuses on the precision of the match or similarity.

completely alike

Emphasizes the completeness of the similarity.

bears resemblance to

Indicates similarity without implying exact identity.

comparable to

Suggests that items are similar enough to be compared, but not necessarily identical.

FAQs

What's a better way to say "identical as for"?

More grammatically sound options include "identical to" or "the same as" depending on the context.

Is "identical as for" grammatically correct?

No, "identical as for" is not considered grammatically correct in standard English. It's better to use "identical to" or "the same as".

When should I use "identical to" instead of "identical as for"?

Always use "identical to". The phrase "identical as for" is non-standard and should be avoided.

What does "identical to" mean?

"Identical to" means exactly alike or equal. It's used to indicate that two or more things are the same in every way.