The concept of transparency is discussed, and the infeasibility of performing a baseline experiment with ideally integrated hardware is presented as a challenge to characterize the transparency of the experimental setup.
The idea of public reason is often presented as a normative ideal, as the way our moral or political rules ought, ideally, to be justified, and also as the way individuals ought, ideally, to engage in deliberation and discussion.
In our view, a chapter on the subject of species should be presented as an essential lesson in one of the earliest chapters (ideally immediately following an introductory chapter presenting the discoveries of Darwin and Mendel).
Likewise, a mechanical filter would ideally consist only of components with the properties of mass and stiffness, but in reality some damping is present as well.
Ideally they would be presented together in a series.
Ideally, it would present an attractive model for its neighbors, politically and economically.
To be useful as a biomarker, a response should ideally be as robust as possible.
The political community acts ideally as a unity.
However, hearing loss should ideally be detected as early as possible, preferably in a neonatal screening program, and the present program may be criticized for failing to do so.
The impact of such sequencing bias can be reduced by removing redundancy at an arbitrary taxonomic level (see for example [ 26]), but ideally the analysis presented here would be performed individually for separate taxa, as depth of sequencing allows.
Ideally, the anthropologist can present a culture from the point of view of its members.
