Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSimilar(59)
Scores for all statements for ICT use, ICT skills, and items for each perceived ICT attribute were averaged to create the specific "ICT use" and "ICT skills" mean score, and "perceived ICT attributes" mean score.
Given the impact of geographic region on the diagnostic accuracy of rK39 ICT, we corrected the sensitivity analyses for region effects and limited the analyses to 15 studies performed in the Indian subcontinent and East Africa.
Average accuracy for the GAMPSON, ICT, and Stochastic model is 71 82%, 56 66%, and 49 64%, respectively.
Fig. 28 Comparison of percentage of accuracy of the GAMPSON, ICT, and Stochastic model over actors of agriculture vs time.
Fig. 29 Comparison of percentage of accuracy of the GAMPSON, ICT, and stochastic model over actors of museum vs time.
Fig. 30 Comparison of percentage of accuracy of the GAMPSON, ICT, and stochastic model over actors of agriculture applied to museum vs time.
Here, we have varied characteristic features of a set of actors of museum social network and applied them over agriculture social network in order to observe accuracy of the GAMPSON, ICT, and Stochastic model over time.
Here, we have considered a set of actors of museum social network and varied their characteristic features over time, and compared percentage of accuracy of the GAMPSON, ICT, and stochastic model.
Here, we have considered a set of actors of agriculture social network and varied their characteristic features over time, and compared percentage of accuracy of the GAMPSON, ICT, and Stochastic model.
Here, we have varied characteristic features of a set of actors of agriculture social network and applied them over museum social network in order to observe accuracy of the GAMPSON, ICT, and stochastic model over time.
Comparison of percentage of accuracy of the GAMPSON, ICT [43], and Stochastic model [38] over actors of agriculture social network and museum social network is shown in Figs. 28 and 29, and comparison of cross social networks is shown in Figs. 30 and 31.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com