Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(1)
Among the models that are based on properties of the interface of the binding site, the one based on polarity-classification of ICs (i.e., Model 3) shows the best performance.
Similar(59)
Only a few studies have compared the virulence traits of ICs I-III [ 11, 23, 24], while no studies have analyzed the virulence features of other emerging epidemic lineages.
At line 3, the precondition stores the read sensor values in one variable called inputs using the LINC operation IC (i.e., INLINE_COMPUTE).
The best frequency shifted higher as the probe advanced more deeply, demonstrating that the system is capable of optically measuring the dorso-ventral organization of IC (i.e., tonotopicity).
Intercropping (IC), i.e. growing more than one species simultaneously in the same field, often increases resource use efficiency and agricultural productivity compared with growing the component crops solely and can enhance yield stability.
Likewise, the probability of a single locus being C iC i is c i, and, therefore, the probability of having no C iC i genotypes is (1 − c i) n; hence, the probability of having at least one C iC i genotype is 1 − (1 − c i) n.
Likewise, individuals who are heterozygotes at multiple loci (D iC i) will have a 25% chance of left-handedness.
Similar selective pressures could in principle work in parallel on all of the C i alleles (or, more particularly, the D iC i genotypes, which would be advantaged).
Similarly, individuals with two C i alleles at just one locus (C iC i) are 50% left-handed, as are CC individuals in the single-locus model, and individuals with a single C i allele (i.e., D iC i at one locus) are 25% left-handed.
Since one quarter of D iC i and one half of C iC i are left-handed, then This equation can then be solved for c i for any value of p(L); see Table 2 for values of p(L) = 10% and n from 1 to 1000.
The probability of having at least one D iC i genotype is then 1-[1- (1− c i) n] − (1− c i) n = (1− c i) n− (1− c i 2 n.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com