Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(1)
Exact(60)
Twenty-nine items had an ICC above 0.7, five items had an ICC between 0.5 and 0.7 and one item had an ICC under 0.5 (table 2).
The ICC between baseline and after one week was calculated, as well as the ICC between one week and three weeks thereafter.
The calculated ICC between raters was 0.96.
ICC between 60 and 80%% is considered good reproducibility [29].
ICC between PET-CT-based and PET-MR-based regional MBF was 0.98.
The inter-machine agreement ICC between the SonoSite and the Vscan was 0.752.
The ICC between raters for the SonoSite was 0.878, and for the Vscan was 0.826.
The ICC between raters for the SonoSite was 0.878, and that for the Vscan was 0.826.
A difference in ICC between two segmentation algorithms was considered non-significant if the CI included zero.
Intra-class correlation coefficients (ICC) between PET-CT and PET-MR regional MBF and CFR were 0.98 and 0.89, respectively.
ICC between PET-MR-based regional MBF with and without TOF and using different filter and reconstruction settings was 1.00.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com