Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(17)
ICC (1, 1) and ICC (1, 3) of EVLW measurement in the present study were 0.97 and 0.99, respectively.
To assess the intraobserver reliability, ICC (1, 1) was used for single-measure reliability and ICC (1, 3) was used for reliability over an average of three measurements.
The intra-observer reproducibility for patellar mobility was excellent, with an ICC (1, 3) of 0.97.
This method involves computing standardized scores (i.e. z-scores) using the following formula (Newson [2002]): (c) z = ( icc 1 − icc 2 ) ( se 1 2 + se 2 2 ) . z = ( icc 1 − icc 2 ) ( se 1 2 + se 2 2 ).
ICC was calculated as the one-way random effects model for the consistency of single measurements, i.e., ICC(1).
All four measures were acceptable, suggesting adequate levels of agreement and reliability (r wg = .85; α = .83; ICC 1 = .67; ICC 2 = .80).80
Similar(43)
ICC(1 -values for latent class-level constructs show substantial differences in the teachers' instructional behaviours (≥1 -valuesrather modest diforrences in students' enjoyment latent between classes (8%).
The ICC (1,1) was used, which is a one-way random single measure ICC.
Test-retest reliability of the DHI-N was satisfactory (ICC 1,1 = 0.90).
Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC 1,1) were calculated within each pair of appraisers and across the pool of appraisers.
The ICC (3,1) was 0.656 and the ICC (1,1) 0.687 indicating fair to good reproducibility.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com