'ibid for' is not correct or usable in written English.
'Ibid' is a Latin term meaning 'in the same place' that is used in academic writing, usually in footnotes or endnotes, to refer to an earlier source. For example, if you are writing a paper and cite the same source multiple times, after the first instance you could use 'ibid' instead of repeating the full reference.
We find no room here to say that the Act presents "effects upon interstate commerce that are only incidental," ibid., for the Act's additional fee on its face targets only out-of-state hazardous waste.
I imagined ibid for the wine.
Ibid for the weaver bird: the male will make a nest (an oblong igloo of sorts) for three weeks, carefully choosing and carrying each grass in its beak.
Data from the iBID for the years 2003 2011 were used for a retrospective descriptive observational study of specialised services workload and admissions in England and Wales.
This suggests that such antirealist paraphrases may not capture the meaning of the original sentences, leaving the field to realist construals of such sentences (cf. again van Inwagen (ibid).; for Walton's response, see Walton (1990 416ff).). is true, but that there is no similar scenario involving a present emperor of Canada.
(ibid, 233) For example, the social role of parenting is partly constituted by the obligations one assumes by becoming a parent, and the social role of citizen is partly constituted by the obligations to obey the laws of the country in which one is a citizen.
If follows that someone who is not allowed to remain anywhere is precluded from all forms of activity, and is perforce deprived of freedom (ibid)..9 For individuals without property, public space is an essential element of their existence: it is the only place in which they can perform certain vital functions (sleep, eat, and satisfy other physiological needs).
Ibid goes for the Chinese thriller I loved at this festival: Diao Yinan's Black Coal/Thin Ice, which tells the story of an alcoholic ex-cop driven to find the reason for cut-up cadaver pieces appearing buried in the coal of freight trains.
In May, 1936, The Pottsville Broadcasting Company, respondent here, sought from the Commission a permit under § 319 Ibid., Title iii, for the construction of a broadcasting station at Pottsville, Pennsylvania.
While it is true, as the lower court said, that 'lawful custody of an automobile does not of itself dispense with constitutional requirements of searches thereafter made of it', ibid., the reason for and nature of the custody may constitutionally justify the search.
As for P2, DeRose claims that it is true "regardless of what epistemic standard it is evaluated at, so its plausibility is easily accounted for" (ibid., 39).
