Type I interactions are the interactions between dockerins and scaffoldin cohesions.
The invariance of N⋯I interactions translates the different size of the used dipyridyl modules into different pitches along the self-assembled rods.
It remains to be determined whether such effects are clinically important and whether or not they are mediated mainly or exclusively by KIR HLA class I interactions.
For compound 2, the 3D network is comprised of 2D sheet by strongly Ag–O and weakly Ag(I …Ag(I) interactions.
The coordination ability of these anions and significant effects of non-covalent C H⋯π and C H⋯X (X = O, Cl and I) interactions play a major role in the crystal packing of these compounds.
Concerning (i) interactions among transgenic proteins, Mesnage et al. (2013) argue that different combinations of transgenic proteins provoke unpredictable synergistic toxicity which will not be detected by standard comparative analyses.
Type II interactions (between complementary loci) had relatively higher PVE than type I interactions, probably because the trait manifests itself only through interaction between two complementary loci as no main-effect QTL is involved.
Comparative analyses with GM (single) are used in S1 papers in order to evaluate the overall stability of GM stack, including (i) interactions among transgenic proteins, (ii) interactions among transgenic and domestic proteins, and (iii) genetic/phenotypic stability.
This section provides an overview of topics discussed in the literature relevant to our research path, classified into three areas: (i) interactions between organizations, (ii) knowledge transfer, and (iii) absorptive and/or desorptive capacity.
In other words, self-diffusivity D within a nanoporous matrix (or, analogously, self-diffusion drag resistance 1/D) is dictated by (a) species i-wall and (b) species i-species i interactions, respectively [42].
These three effects could in turn be mediated via two types of Ly49-MHC class I interactions: cis or trans.
