Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSimilar(60)
In our statistic analysis, the upper and lower quartiles of the Rotter's I-E scale distribution were chosen to define interviews led by physicians with internal LOC (n=22) (Rotter I-E score from 0 to 7) or physicians with external LOC (n=18) (Rotter I-E higher than 11).
However, loss of postgastrular zen expression does not explain, why in lower cyclorrhaphan and non-cyclorrhaphan dipterans the patterning of the dorsal blastoderm results in the specification of two distinct extraembryonic tissues types as opposed to one in schizophoran (i. e. higher cyclorrhaphan) flies such as D. melanogaster.
The sum of the domain scores were scaled in a positive direction (i.e. higher scores denote higher HRQoL).
The last set of runs present 66 99 % samples missing, i.e., high degradation (High-Yellow).
The correlation between breeding values estimated with different models was very high in all cases (i.e. higher than 0.98).
It is clear that more tapered waveguides (i.e., higher taper slope or angle) suffer from higher radiation loss.
Some questions were worded in a positive direction (i.e. high score indicates high knowledge), and some negative (i.e. high scores indicates low knowledge).
Genotype affected isotope ratios, and the genotype 592 had lower intrinsic water use efficiency (i.e. higher leaf ΔC) and lower carboxylation efficiency (i.e. higher ratio of ΔC and ΔO) than genotype 520 (Table 1, main effect genotype).
The Kitagawa method was used to explore excess in birth weight distribution (i.e., higher frequency of prematurity) and birth weight specific mortality (i.e., higher mortality rates once born at a specific birth weight), using the same reference population.
The interval having the highest resistivity (i.e., highest Q values) is the upper Eagle Ford (Fig. 12).
Further, the pregnancy-related health outcomes related to high SMI (i.e., high DMA levels) are less well understood.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com