This digitization, i.e., the process by which analog information is converted into digital format, enhances former analog objects by becoming programmable, addressable, sensible, communicable, memorable, traceable, and associable (Yoo 2010, pp. 225).
Digitization, I think, will inevitably have to replace it.
When I refer to digitization, what I mean is that our rites live on in data long after they are performed: commutes are captured by a smartphone's GPS, purchases by banks and credit cards, thoughts in texts and emails (and unsolicited voice recordings).
The employees are the engine that fuels digital digitization of business.
I wonder if this digitization will pinch some of the magic away from pirates.
This book I'm reading called Digital Signatures: The Impact of Digitization on Popular Music (MIT 2016) describes, "A certain kind of reverb might indicate the emptiness of despair".
So I have different attitudes about digitization, about a lot of stuff.
When digitization came in, I started to see there was an opportunity to solve it on a grander scale.
Although these models differ from each other due to several aspects, they all have a common core, i.e. the conception that digitization is first and foremost a hyper-dynamic condition to which organizations need to find responsive solutions.
Quite the contrary, as I said, we are benefitting from digitization, we are embracing it, but we need certain rules that secure fairness in competition.
