Sentence examples for i am weakly from inspiring English sources

I am weakly inclined to believe that the past has been in itself worth it.

Thus I am weakly located at a certain region, r, whose shape, size, and position perfectly match my own, I am weakly located at the bottom half of that region, I am weakly located at a certain much larger region, r+, that has r as a proper part, and I am weakly located at a certain scattered region, r*, that's made up of the bottom half of r together with a small region somewhere in Siberia.

In short, if r is the one and only region at which I am exactly located, then I am weakly located at just those regions that overlap r. Figure 1 Figure 1 illustrates exact location and weak location.

D i is weakly closed in L X.

If and are commuting on and is -nonexpansive on, then provided either (i) is weakly compact and is demiclosed or (ii) is weakly compact and satisfies Opial's condition.

(i) is weakly quasi-nonexpansive with respect to ; (ii) is a monotonically decreasing sequence in ; (iii) ; (iv if the sequence satisfies, then (2.3).

We say that party (i) is weakly risk-averse (or has weakly risk-averse preferences) whenever begin{aligned} V_i ( {c(pi )} ge pi V_i ({c_L })+ 1-pi )V_i ( {c_R }), hbox { for all } pi,, in [0,1].

p ij  = 1 when the two goals are equal in priority  p ij  = 3 when G i is weakly more important than G j  p ij  = 5 when G i is strongly more important than G j  p ij  = 7 when G i is very strongly more important than G j  p ij  = 9 when G i is absolutely more important than Gj.

p ij  = 3 when G i is weakly more important than G j.  p ij  = 5 when G i is strongly more important than G j.  p ij  = 7 when G i is very strongly more important than G j.  p ij  = 9 when G i is absolutely more important than Gj.

C i = { x ˜ i : [ 0, 1 ] → [ 0, 1 ] : x ˜ i = { c x ˜ i if  ω ∈ [ i − 1 i, 1 ] ; 0 otherwise,  where  c x ˜ i ∈ [ 0, 1 ]  is constant } and D i = ∏ j ≠ i L X j × C i. We notice that if x i ∈ C i, then it is F i -measurable and μ-integrable, then C i ⊂ L X i and C i is weakly closed in L X i.

Since the graph of ( I − f ) + N F ( T i ) is weakly-strongly closed, we obtain that by taking into (2.23) and (2.19), θ ∈ ( I − f ) x ∗ + N F ( T i ) ( x ∗ ).