Exact(5)
I'm omitting my daily Diet Coke — which I know is probably a great thing — but I ask myself, "WWGD?" ("What would Gisele do?") and I abstain.
And then there were the disasters: Terrence Malick's inane, camera-drunk "To the Wonder" is remembered with special amazement; Baz Luhrmann's frantic, glitzy, over-stylized "The Great Gatsby" whirled its way into rapid oblivion; and both "Man of Steel" and "Oz the Great and Powerful" remind us how empty big-studio filmmaking is much of the time (I'm omitting countless other examples).
Granted, I'm omitting the frustrating parts of this arrangement.
(I'm omitting the couple's last name because Noe is still vulnerable to enforcement).
In his excellent book The No A****** Rule (I'm omitting the title not from prudery but from fear of spam-blockers), and also on his blog, Work Matters, Bob Sutton has a quiz to help people recognize if they are a******* -- I was inspired to adapt that material for this quiz.
Similar(55)
In this section, index i is omitted.
The sensor index i is omitted in this derivation for simplicity.
where ({theta }=arctan left (frac {Y_{i}-y}{X_{i}-x}right)). Here, the sensor index i is omitted again for simplicity.
For a simplex S = { p 0, …, p n } ∈ K ≤ n we denote its boundary by ∂ S : = { { p 0, …, p ^ i, …, p n } : i ∈ I n } ⊂ K ≤ n, where p ^ i means that the vertex p i is omitted.
For notation simplicity, the sensor index i is omitted from the equations common to all the sensors, while it is included when needed, in the rest of the paper.
As negative values of the AUC i would have distorted the analyses, the evaluation of the AUC i was omitted.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com