Sentence examples for hypothesis whose from inspiring English sources

Macroeconomists tend to use a simplified version of the optimization framework called the "permanent income hypothesis," whose origins trace back to economist Milton Friedman's treatise A Theory of the Consumption Function (1957).

Moises Velasquez-Manoff — a journalist and also, as it happens, a patient — has fallen hard for an idea known as the hygiene hypothesis, whose implications, if followed out along a widely branching chain of extended supposition, threaten to unravel much of what we think we know about health and disease.

We take this as a working hypothesis, whose validity can be assessed from the significance of the derived results.

Proving the termination of a recursively defined algorithm requires a certain creativity of the (human or automated) reasoner for inventing a hypothesis whose truth implies that the algorithm terminates.

However, these studies focusing on single-host systems usually neglect that increasing connectivity can increase species diversity which might reduce pathogen transmission via the 'dilution effect', a hypothesis whose generality is still disputed.

In Figure 4, all the p values of t-statistics are less than 0.05, and then the original hypothesis whose parameter is 0 should be rejected, and the three unknown parameters are considered to be significant.

Then, we rank these hypotheses according to their scores and prune the hypotheses whose scores are lower than threshold T h.

Hypotheses whose connection with the evidence is entirely statistical in nature will inevitably be fully outcome-compatible on the entire evidence stream.

Although these are three exceptionally challenging questions, they are now being approached with clear hypotheses whose testing is being facilitated by an ever-improving array of technologies for vaccine design and immunological characterisation.

Accordingly, for James, metaphysical theses were to be interpreted as hypotheses whose adoption or acceptance by a pragmatic agent was justified only if it would lead to verifiable or confirmable consequences in future human experience.

From these elementary phenomena, we generalize (e.g., via the empirical induction principle) to elementary facts and move, by means of differential equations, to laws and verifiable hypotheses whose number should be kept as small as possible (Poincaré 1902: 168 171; 168 171168 171).