hypothesis was supported

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "hypothesis was supported" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used in scientific or academic contexts when discussing the results of an experiment or study that confirm the initial hypothesis. Example: "The results of the experiment indicated that the hypothesis was supported, leading to further investigation into the underlying mechanisms."

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

Wiki

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

This hypothesis was supported.

Journal of Sound and Vibration

Thus, the null hypothesis was supported.

Journal of Orthopaedics and Traumatology

Our first hypothesis was supported by the results.

New Zealand Journal of Forestry Science

Thus, our third hypothesis was supported by the data.

International Journal for Educational Integrity

The null hypothesis was supported for between groups.

Arthroscopy: The Journal of Arthroscopic & Related Surgery

Table 4 and Fig. 2 show whether or not each hypothesis was supported.

Asian Journal of Sustainability and Social Responsibility

This hypothesis was supported in model 4 and model 5 in Table 2.

The Journal of Chinese Sociology

This hypothesis was supported by the observation that larger neonates have larger abdominal fat bodies.

Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology Part A: Molecular & Integrative Physiology

In light of the study results, the first hypothesis was supported.

Personality and Individual Differences

This hypothesis was supported by further studies using single-angle throats and numerical simulation (DEM CFD).

European Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences

This hypothesis was supported further by the success of trading models with different frequencies and risk profiles.

Probability, Uncertainty and Quantitative Risk

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When writing scientifically, clearly state what evidence led to the conclusion that the "hypothesis was supported". Provide specific data or results rather than general statements.

Common error

Avoid claiming the "hypothesis was supported" if the evidence is weak or if alternative explanations exist. Use cautious language if the support is only partial or tentative.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "hypothesis was supported" functions as a declarative statement in scientific and academic writing. It communicates that empirical evidence or data aligns with and strengthens a proposed explanation. Ludwig confirms the phrase is suitable for formal writing.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

Science

95%

Wiki

3%

News & Media

1%

Less common in

Formal & Business

0%

Encyclopedias

0%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "hypothesis was supported" is a grammatically sound and frequently used phrase, particularly in scientific and academic writing to express that evidence aligns with a proposed explanation. As Ludwig confirms, it's appropriate for formal contexts. While various alternatives exist to add nuance, understanding the subtle differences is key to precise communication. When using this phrase, ensure the level of support from evidence is accurately represented and avoid overstating conclusions.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

the data validated the hypothesis

Replaces the passive voice with an active construction, emphasizing the role of the data.

the evidence confirmed the hypothesis

Uses "confirmed" instead of "supported", suggesting a stronger level of validation.

the findings corroborated the hypothesis

Employs "corroborated", indicating that the hypothesis was strengthened by the findings.

the results sustained the hypothesis

Substitutes "supported" with "sustained", implying that the hypothesis held up under scrutiny.

the study lent credence to the hypothesis

Uses a more formal tone to express that the study provided evidence in favor of the hypothesis.

the hypothesis gained support from the analysis

Shifts the focus to the hypothesis as the subject, showing it actively receiving support.

the hypothesis was borne out by the data

Uses the idiom "borne out" to mean that the data proved the hypothesis to be true.

the research upheld the hypothesis

Replaces "supported" with "upheld", suggesting the hypothesis remained valid throughout the research.

the observations backed the hypothesis

Uses "backed" as a more informal way to express that the observations supported the hypothesis.

the investigation favored the hypothesis

Implies that the investigation results leaned towards supporting the hypothesis.

FAQs

What does it mean when a "hypothesis was supported"?

When a "hypothesis was supported", it means that the evidence gathered from research or experimentation aligned with and provided reason to believe the initial prediction or proposed explanation was correct. It suggests the data is consistent with the hypothesis.

What can I say instead of "hypothesis was supported"?

You can use alternatives like "the data validated the hypothesis", "the evidence confirmed the hypothesis", or "the findings corroborated the hypothesis" to convey a similar meaning.

Is it accurate to say "hypothesis was supported" if the results are only partially aligned?

If the results only partially align, it's more accurate to say that the hypothesis received partial support or that there is some evidence to support the hypothesis. It's important not to overstate the level of support.

What's the difference between "hypothesis was supported" and "hypothesis was proven"?

"Hypothesis was supported" implies that the evidence is in favor of the hypothesis, but doesn't necessarily guarantee its absolute truth. "Hypothesis was proven" suggests a higher degree of certainty, implying that the evidence conclusively establishes the hypothesis as true. In scientific contexts, 'supported' is often more appropriate than 'proven'.