Thus, while we believe that our design constitutes a conservative test of our hypotheses, replicating our results with a design in which different stakeholders' interests are not depicted as mutually exclusive would be a worthwhile endeavor for future research.
These findings support the hypothesis that replicated scientific evidence alone does not easily change physician behaviours [ 16], unless evidence-supported clinical practices are accepted by the general public and supported by health policies.
In analyzing for the third hypothesis, we replicated previous findings about the predictive power of caregiver impression of patient's QOL on the QOL of the caregiver in chronic medical populations [ 14- 16].
Cases are treated as experiments in which the hypotheses are replicated case by case.
Another possibility would be the examination of an ace2Δ swi4Δ double mutant, which under the above hypothesis should replicate the bmh1Δ phenotype regarding suppression of cdc13-1.
This result supports descriptively the first hypothesis and replicates the findings of a previous study on fruit and vegetable intake [ 17].
The current study attempted testing a previous hypothesis and replicating previous findings in a large and longitudinal population-based independent study/sample.
To test this hypothesis, the authors replicated 2 well-known experiments that had demonstrated differential effects of varying the information-processing goal (impression formation or memorization) on processing the identical behavioral information.
Regarding our hypothesis, we first replicated findings that CP participants can achieve a face recognition accuracy comparable to controls, albeit requiring more initial training and longer reaction times.
The association of the II genotype with ESRF in DIABHYCAR, contradicting this hypothesis, was not replicated in the SURDIAGENE cohort.
