hypothesis does not hold

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase 'hypothesis does not hold' is correct and can be used in written English.
You can use it when you are stating that a hypothesis or tested claim was not found to be correct. For example, "Our research showed that the hypothesis did not hold, and the result was not as expected."

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

News & Media

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

19 human-written examples

But if the amyloid hypothesis does not hold up, much of Alzheimer's research could wind up back at Square 1. Answers are urgently needed.

The New York Times - Health

A negative result is when the outcome of an experiment or a model is not what is expected or when a hypothesis does not hold.

Image and Vision Computing

Inspecting MH results, however, shows that our hypothesis does not hold.

EURASIP Journal on Wireless Communications and Networking

The test results provide evidence that the efficient market hypothesis does not hold for the gold exchange-traded funds' market in India.

Financial Innovation

The results suggest that the Samuelson hypothesis does not hold for the select commodity futures in the Indian context, except for the gold futures.

Financial Innovation

Gupta and Rajib (2012) also examined this issue for eight commodities, and they concluded that the Samuelson hypothesis does not hold for the majority of the considered commodity contracts.

Financial Innovation

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

41 human-written examples

But that hypothesis doesn't hold water because Comey was appointed by Obama in 2013 for a term of ten years that cannot be shortened.

Huffington Post

4 Species interactions across abiotic stress gradients do not follow a simple pattern, and there are specific circumstances under which the predictions arising from the stress-gradient hypothesis do not hold.

Duke University

The hypothesis did not hold in countries where it was known that other serogroups were also prevalent and where laboratory data were too sparse to ascertain whether NmA was the predominant serogroup, as was the case in the Democratic Republic of Congo, with NmC.

Clinical Infectious Diseases

We propose a technique taking into account diversion hypothesis and dynamic programming to assess speculation projects when suspicions for financial option pricing hypothesis don't hold.

Journal of Industrial Engineering International

The robustness of the proposed approach when either the homogeneity or the stationarity hypotheses do not hold is shown through computer simulations.

Signal Processing

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When writing scientific reports, use "hypothesis does not hold" to indicate that experimental results do not support the initial claim. Be sure to provide detailed evidence and reasoning.

Common error

Do not use "hypothesis does not hold" as a definitive end to research. Instead, frame it as a step towards refining understanding and prompting further investigation. State the limitations and suggest alternative approaches.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "hypothesis does not hold" functions as a declarative statement within scientific or academic discourse. It indicates that a proposed explanation or prediction has been tested and found to be unsupported by the evidence, as confirmed by Ludwig AI.

Expression frequency: Uncommon

Frequent in

Science

80%

News & Media

15%

Encyclopedias

5%

Less common in

Formal & Business

0%

Reference

0%

Social Media

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "hypothesis does not hold" is a grammatically sound and formally appropriate way to express that a proposed explanation has been tested and found to be unsupported by evidence. Ludwig AI confirms its correctness, and Ludwig examples reveal its frequent use in scientific and academic contexts. While alternatives exist, such as "hypothesis is not supported" or "hypothesis is disproven", the core meaning remains consistent: the initial claim lacks empirical validation. When using this phrase, ensure you provide sufficient evidence and reasoning to support your conclusion. Avoid overstating the negative finding; instead, frame it as a step toward refining understanding and encouraging future research.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

the hypothesis is disproven

Focuses on the act of disproving, suggesting a more definitive rejection of the hypothesis.

the hypothesis is not supported

Emphasizes the lack of evidence supporting the hypothesis, implying a weaker rejection.

the hypothesis is refuted

Suggests a strong and successful counterargument against the hypothesis.

the hypothesis fails

Indicates the hypothesis did not produce the expected results or outcomes.

the evidence contradicts the hypothesis

Highlights the presence of evidence that directly opposes the hypothesis.

the data invalidate the hypothesis

Focuses on the role of data in showing the hypothesis to be untrue.

the prediction was incorrect

Specifically addresses the failure of a predictive aspect of the hypothesis.

the theory is unsustainable

Implies that the hypothesis, when considered as a theoretical framework, cannot be maintained.

the premise is flawed

Highlights a fundamental weakness or error in the underlying assumption of the hypothesis.

the idea is untenable

Suggests that the hypothesis is indefensible or cannot be reasonably maintained.

FAQs

When is it appropriate to say "hypothesis does not hold"?

Use "hypothesis does not hold" when experimental data or evidence fails to support the proposed hypothesis. It's common in scientific research and formal writing to express that the tested prediction was not validated.

What are some alternatives to "hypothesis does not hold"?

Depending on the context, you can use alternatives such as "the hypothesis is not supported", "the hypothesis is disproven", or "the evidence contradicts the hypothesis".

Is "hypothesis does not hold true" redundant?

While technically not incorrect, "hypothesis does not hold true" can be seen as slightly redundant, since "hold" already implies truth or validity. The simpler "hypothesis does not hold" is usually preferred.

How does "hypothesis does not hold" differ from "hypothesis is rejected"?

"Hypothesis is rejected" often suggests a more conclusive outcome, implying that the hypothesis has been definitively proven false. "Hypothesis does not hold" can imply a weaker contradiction, meaning the data simply doesn't support the hypothesis at this time.