Suggestions(1)
Exact(1)
So, by the inductive hypothesis, I know what this… It is some h i over k i. 2.
Similar(59)
Dr. Walker said she concluded that while "this sounds like a very smart person with a very intriguing hypothesis, I don't know him and I don't know how much I trust him".
(3) By hypothesis (H2), we know that (varPhi (I =frac{g(I)}{I}) is a monotone decreasing function on (I>0).
By hypothesis, we know that the inequality holds for every.
By our hypothesis, we know that is continuous.
We have, so by our induction hypothesis, we know that the lemma also holds for n, m+1 and.
It's what Newton was on about when he wrote "Hypotheses non fingo" in the second edition of his Principia: "I don't make hypotheses," he's saying, "I just know".
By hypothesis (H1), we know that (hat{x}(t)notinpartial{D}) for any (tin[0, T]_{mathbb {T}}).
Estimation results can only be interpreted according to the hypothesis that we know the real model.
By hypotheses we know that there exists such that for every with the inequality (4.27).
From our hypotheses we know that (B(M)) is relatively weakly compact.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com