Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(60)
Hence hypothesis (i) is satisfied.
which by virtue of Hypothesis (i) yields.
First and foremost, by the assumptions of SDE (1), the hypothesis (i) obviously holds.
However, the hypothesis (i) of Theorem 3.1 in [20] is not satisfied.
Assume that the hypothesis (i) of Proposition 4.1 and the resonance condition (4.34) hold.
Assume that the hypothesis (i) of Proposition 4.1 and the no-resonance condition (4.27) hold.
Contrary to hypothesis (i), M. montanus and P. maniculatus populations were not positively related to vegetation type within linear habitats and their adjacent crop and non-crop areas.
Define on such that Under hypothesis (i) of Theorem 2.2, for all the mappings and are of class on The proof can be found in [19].
In the context of hypothesis (i), the completeness of g ( X ) is not necessary as it can alternately be replaced by the completeness of F ( X 2 ).
By hypothesis (i), there exists a T > t 0 such that the unique (i -solution of problem (3.1) exi -solution 0, T ].
is well-defined and under hypothesis (i) of Theorem 2.1, for all the mapping is of class and one has, for all.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com