hurt with

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "hurt with" is not commonly used in standard written English and may sound awkward or unclear.
It could be used in contexts where someone is expressing emotional pain caused by another person or situation, but it is not a standard expression. Example: "She felt hurt with the way he spoke to her during the argument."

News & Media

Wiki

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

Someone can get hurt with a stunt.

The New York Times

It certainly doesn't hurt with fundraising.

The Guardian - Opinion

But they don't hurt with every hit.

The New York Times - Sports

Griffin could get hurt, with that running style.

The New York Times - Sports

That they hurt with the hurt of their fellow humans.

The Guardian - Books

The pilot was more seriously hurt with back injuries.

The Guardian

Would sentiment from their title-game flops hurt with pollsters?

The New York Times

It will help with some voters and hurt with others".

The New York Times

Sanctions are starting to hurt, with investment dropping in key sectors, including oil and gas.

The Economist

He was hurt with four and a half minutes left in the third quarter.

The New York Times

The police said 100 officers were hurt, with 61 needing hospital treatment.

The Guardian

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Consider using more common alternatives like "hurt by" or "affected by" for clearer communication. While "hurt with" is grammatically acceptable, it's not always the most idiomatic choice.

Common error

Overusing "hurt with" can create ambiguity. Instead of saying "He was hurt with the criticism", consider "He was hurt by the criticism" for a clearer and more natural expression.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "hurt with" primarily functions as a verb phrase indicating the experience of pain or negative impact in relation to a specific cause or situation. As Ludwig AI notes, it is acceptable but not always the most common or clear choice.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

65%

Wiki

18%

Formal & Business

7%

Less common in

Science

4%

Encyclopedias

3%

Reference

3%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, while grammatically acceptable, the phrase "hurt with" is not always the most idiomatic or common way to express pain or negative impact in relation to a cause. Ludwig AI confirms that alternatives like "hurt by" or "affected by" are often clearer and more natural choices. The phrase appears across diverse contexts, including news and media, indicating a neutral register. For clearer and more effective writing, consider using more precise prepositions to avoid ambiguity and ensure your message resonates with your audience.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

suffer from

Focuses on experiencing negative effects or pain as a result of something.

struggle with

Indicates difficulty in dealing with a particular situation or problem.

have difficulty because of

Highlights the challenges faced as a direct result of something.

experience pain due to

More explicit about the cause-and-effect relationship of pain.

feel the effects of

Emphasizes the sensory or emotional experience of consequences.

be affected by

Broader term suggesting an influence, often negative, without specifying the nature of the impact.

contend with

Suggests actively dealing with challenges or difficulties.

be wounded by

Highlights a deep emotional or psychological pain inflicted by something.

bear the brunt of

Implies enduring the worst part of something negative.

be impacted by

Similar to 'be affected by' but often used in more formal contexts.

FAQs

What does "hurt with" mean?

"Hurt with" generally means to experience pain, either physical or emotional, in connection with something else. However, it's not always the most common or clearest way to express this, and alternatives like "hurt by" or "affected by" may be more appropriate.

What can I say instead of "hurt with"?

Depending on the context, you can use alternatives like "hurt by", "affected by", "suffering from", or "struggling with". The best choice depends on the specific nuance you want to convey.

Is "hurt with" grammatically correct?

While grammatically acceptable, "hurt with" isn't always the most idiomatic choice. It can sound awkward in some contexts. Using "hurt by" is often clearer and more natural.

Which is correct, "hurt by" or "hurt with"?

"Hurt by" is generally preferred over "hurt with" because it is more common and direct. While "hurt with" isn't necessarily incorrect, "hurt by" is often a better choice for clarity and naturalness.