Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(5)
Exact(6)
Second, patients in whom HURT questions 1-4 simprovementpreported reported satisfaction (positive PSS scores), while those in whom HURT signalled worsening (or no improvement) reported dissatisfaction (negative PSS scores).
Many of the Dodgers' high-priced players were hurt, questions were being asked about Manager Don Mattingly's future, and not even a couple of bench-clearing brawls against division rivals had awakened them.
Intra-class correlation coefficient for HURT questions 1-7 ranged from 0.66 to 0.93, with highly significant P-values in each case (Table 1).
Table 1 Correlations between test and retest responses 4-6 weeks apart to HURT questions 1-8 (n = 40) HURT question Intra-class correlation coefficient P-value 1.
Responsiveness of HURT to clinical change was assessed by comparing base-line responses to HURT questions 1 6 with those at follow up.
We assessed responsiveness of HURT to clinical change by comparing base-line responses to HURT questions 1-6 withoseose at follow up.
Similar(53)
After the follow-up visit, patients in the intervention group were divided into two categories, "improved" and "worsened", on each individual HURT question 1-4 (these four questions reflecting headache frequency, headache-attributed disability, and medication use).
For example, on HURT question 1 ("on how many days in the last month did you have a headache?"), a patient answering "3-5" at both first and follow-up visits would be considered as worsened, since no benefit was reported despite treatment, whereas he/she would be considered improved only when the answer to the same question on follow up was "1-2" or "0".
The items "hurt" (Question 3) and "cross" (Question 5) were chosen as it was felt that these were easy words for participants to read.
But there is little doubt that the president is being hurt by questions over his health overhaul.
The senator was also hurt by questions about the extent of his experience, an issue compounded in the minds of some voters by his youthful looks.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com