The phrase "humanity uses" is correct and usable in written English.
You can use it when you are discussing how people use something or engage in some activity. For example: "Humanity uses technology to improve and streamline communication."
Cities are not just where 3.5 billion of us live they are where more than half of humanity uses electricity, drives cars, and throws out garbage, among myriad other activities that emit greenhouse gases.
Humanity uses 18 terawatts of power every year.
Today, humanity uses the equivalent of 1.7 Earths to provide the resources we use.
The Sun delivers more energy to the Earth in an hour than humanity uses in a year.
Given that humanity uses many different languages and cultural codes, how can that unchanging message possibly be conveyed, without distortion, to every corner of the earth?
But this is surely clear: the propositions which are the only ones that humanity uses will have a sense just as they are and do not wait upon a future analysis in order to acquire a sense.
While they could see no reason to bow down to humanity using their own wisdom, they respected God's wisdom and choice to create us.
His Radio 4 series A History of the World in 100 Objects, told a subversive multicultural history of humanity using the museum's collection.
That was probably what some section of humanity used to illustrate man's superiority over other animals: "memories of miseries that memorialise".
They are, at the very least, an attempt to push past my own singularity — chaos, randomness, loss, grief, failure, and love — and connect to the rest of humanity using the only tools I have been given.
In many cases, however, conservationists have campaigned successfully on behalf of both nature and humanity, using utilitarian and preservationist arguments to protect tens of thousands of acres of wilderness, save species from extinction, and clean up polluted neighborhoods and waterways.
