To establish the repeatability and validity of this testing device, reliability and human participant data were collected while the stiffnesses of simulated and prosthetic limbs were systematically varied.
However, captures were conducted at the end of each field trip (i.e., after demographic and human exposure data were collected for multiple days) and all study sites were subject to the same capture activities; thus, our activities should not bias our results.
The human promoter methylation data were collected from the 28 tissues as analyzed above, and gene expression was measured across 107 human tissues (including the same 28 tissues) using Affymetrix U133 human expression microarrays (Johansson et al. 2007; Bell et al. 2011; Chari et al. 2011).
Human protein complex data were collected from CORUM database (Ruepp et al. 2010).
The human iNOS diffraction data were collected at BL11-1 of SSRL using a Pilatus pixel array detector.
Human milk intake data were collected from nursing flowsheets by recording separately daily intake of maternal and donor milk.
Human protein interaction data were collected, extracted, and integrated from the HPRD [ 11], BIND [ 20], MINT [ 21], STRING [ 26], and OPHID [ 25] databases, using data warehousing techniques.
Patients consent was not needed according to the Dutch 'Regulations on medical research involving human subjects', since data were collected anonymously (using residents' numbers), and residents were not subjected to any treatment.
On transmission, the emphasis was on knowledge of animal reservoirs and transmission routes and on clinical features, questions were asked about classical and pathognomonic features of zoonoses in humans and finally data were collected on knowledge of diagnostic protocols for zoonoses.
