huge sums of

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "huge sums of" is correct and usable in written English. You can use it when referring to large amounts of money or resources. Example: "The project required huge sums of investment to succeed." Alternative expressions include "large amounts of" and "substantial sums of."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Academia

Formal & Business

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

59 human-written examples

Huge sums of money?

The New York Times

This will involve huge sums of money.

The Economist

They just made huge sums of money.

Yale University

Some eventually contribute huge sums of money.

The Guardian - Tech

"Huge sums of money capture people's imagination".

The New York Times

You're not putting out huge sums of methane.

Cornell University

Major airlines continue to lose huge sums of money.

The New York Times

Every year it reportedly received huge sums of state cash.

The Guardian - Sport

Various American companies have parked huge sums of money abroad.

The New York Times

And they need huge sums of cash very quickly.

The New York Times

In a lot of cases Arslan was conning modest farmers out of huge sums of money".

Independent

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

It pairs exceptionally well with verbs that suggest movement or loss, such as investing, siphoning or wasting.

Common error

Avoid using "huge sums of" with countable nouns that do not represent a collective mass or a divisible amount. For instance, "huge sums of people" is incorrect; use "large numbers of" instead. The word sums is strictly reserved for things that can be added together, typically currency or abstract mathematical totals.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "huge sums of" functions as a quantifying adjectival phrase used to modify nouns, primarily those related to finance. It consists of an adjective ("huge") providing emphasis, a plural noun ("sums") indicating quantity and a preposition ("of") linking it to the substance being quantified. As shown in Ludwig, it frequently precedes money or cash to underscore a high level of investment or expenditure.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

75%

Academia

15%

Formal & Business

10%

Less common in

Science

5%

Encyclopedias

2%

Social Media

1%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "huge sums of" is a highly effective and grammatically correct way to emphasize large financial quantities. According to Ludwig AI data, it is most frequently collocated with money, cash and capital, appearing across a wide spectrum of authoritative news and academic publications. While it is synonymous with "large sums of", the inclusion of the adjective "huge" offers a stronger emotive impact, highlighting the significant nature of the amount mentioned. It is particularly prevalent in discussions regarding corporate finance, government spending and economic shifts. Overall, it serves as a reliable tool for writers aiming to strike a balance between descriptive clarity and impactful reporting.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

large sums of

Provides a more neutral, less emphatic tone than using the word huge

vast sums of

Increases the sense of scale and breadth of the amount mentioned

significant sums of

Suggests that the amount has a meaningful or measurable impact on the situation

substantial amounts of

Replaces the financial focus of sums with the more general term amounts

massive amounts of

Conveys a sense of physical or metaphorical weight and immense scale

considerable sums of

Implies an amount that is large enough to require careful thought or attention

immense quantities of

Uses a more formal term for volume or count

colossal sums of

Adds a hyperbolic or dramatic flair to the description of the amount

hefty sums of

A slightly more informal or descriptive way to suggest a burdensome or large amount

untold sums of

Suggests an amount so large it cannot be easily counted or disclosed

FAQs

How do I use "huge sums of" in a sentence?

You can use it to describe large amounts of money, as in: "The government invested "huge sums of" money into the new infrastructure project."

What can I say instead of "huge sums of"?

You can use alternatives like "large sums of", "vast amounts of" or "significant quantities of" depending on the desired emphasis.

Is "huge sums of" appropriate for formal writing?

Yes, it is widely used in professional news reporting and academic lectures. For extremely formal technical reports, you might prefer "substantial financial resources".

What is the difference between "huge sums of" and "large sums of"?

The primary difference is the level of intensity. "huge sums of" is more emphatic and descriptive, while "large sums of" is more neutral and objective.