The phrase "huge evidence" is grammatically correct and can be used in written English.
Example: The detective presented a folder filled with huge evidence that proved the suspect's guilt. This phrase is typically used to describe a large amount of evidence that is significant or convincing in a given context. It can also be used to emphasize the weight or importance of the evidence being presented. It is often used in legal or investigative contexts, but can also be used in other situations where evidence is being presented or discussed.
At times we have to give players an opportunity at international level without really having huge evidence at their club to support that argument.
But there's huge evidence for sticky prices, lots of evidence that monetary shocks have real effects — and it's hard to produce a coherent model in which that's true that doesn't also leave room for fiscal policy.
Huge evidence for the defense?
The one factor they all have in common is excessive khat use, which leads us to believe there is huge evidence of medical harm".
There is huge evidence that proto-oncogenes and suppressor genes are implicated in resistance of tumours.
There is also huge evidence supporting the relationship between poor diet components such as increase in saturated fat [ 10– 12], total fat or energy from fat [ 13], and energy from animal foods [ 14– 16], additive sugar [ 17– 21], and alcohol [ 22– 24] and adverse health outcomes such as weight gain, type 2 diabetes, heart disease, some cancers, and overall mortality.
Although similar programs have been established in China, (e.g., the China National Stroke Registry and the National Center for Stroke Care Quality Control) [ 18, 19], there are still huge evidence-based practice gaps in the secondary prevention of ischemic stroke and TIA.
Finally, there is a huge body of evidence (often with a degree of mathematical evidence) that SvO2 values vary widely in ICU patients, either for physiological, pathological or metrological reasons.
Martin Whittaker, the scientist who headed the FSS team, spoke of the huge volume of evidence: "The team pulled together every strand of forensic evidence to create a kind of 'spider's web' and in the centre of it all ... was Philip Smith.
As professor Rosie Woodroffe of London's Zoological Society said to the Guardian: "This is a huge disappointment for evidence based policy making... the government has failed to produce any evidence that farmer led culling is helping to control cattle TB".
The panel worked tirelessly over the last three weeks to gather a huge amount of evidence, and we felt our recommendations were valid and appropriate based on that evidence.
