Suggestions(1)
Exact(3)
However, on page 282 of "An Ontological Idealism", McTaggart explicitly states that we never perceive objects as being material.
However, on page 11 and several other places in the manuscript old notation is still being used.
However, on page 5, the same study is cited as demonstrating that "highly expressed genes in flowering plants are more compact [ 14]." I think the latter sentence represents a misstatement that should be corrected.
Similar(57)
However, stacking one page view on top of another won't be enough to derail Google.
There is one error which must be corrected before that, however: namely, on page 3, where the functions "sin" and "cos" are said to be uncomputable, by virtue of being transcendent.
(One mistake, however, is on page 44; in fact, Dr. Earl Gray's research on phthalates was conducted for the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, published in the peer-reviewed literature, and then provided to the National Toxicology Program's Center for the Evaluation of Risks to Human Reproduction).
The finest snow story of all, however, was buried on page D14 in last Wednesday's paper, a reminiscence of the snows of yesteryear and the origins of the weather-narrative form in newsrooms.
I cannot let pass, however, a sentence on page 17: "While the Executive should wield all his powers under the constitution with energy, he should not be able to abrogate the constitution except in face of war, revolution or economic chaos".
However, under "Urbanization" on page 6, the author states that women joining the labour force "greatly influences the shift from home cooked traditional food towards precooked convenience food and fast food".
However, on an inside page of the very edition that chronicled the drama in Worthing, the Argus lamented that Sussex police are now swamped by burdens on their time that prevent them from attending to "what really matters to taxpayers".
However, I gave up on page 189 after finding two absurd typographical errors within a few pages; the first is a sentence something like 'him... suppose him' and the second is the word 'threw' where it should have been 'through'through
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.
Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com