Greater effect sizes in QOL between the two contrasting groups may be observed, however, in intervention studies when specific targeted improvements are provided to the patients (e.g., changing the living environment to a nursing home, providing relaxation training) [ 40].
However, in the intervention and control kebeles, the rates were low in autumn (March May) when farmers prepare for the farming season, and this was followed by another peak in early summer (June August).
However, in both intervention groups, a significant number of patients did not regain consciousness after treatment.
However, in the intervention arm, we lost an additional 21 women at six-month follow-up.
However, in the intervention group, the proportion of individuals with normal glucose values was similar between successful and unsuccessful participants.
However, in the intervention groups, participants that completed follow-up measurements had also completed more modules compared to the participants with missing follow-up.
However, in the intervention group, nurses were requested to take real-time glucose readings in close intervals according to clinical necessity at their personal discretion, but at least every 2 h in contrast with the control group.
However, in that intervention, most physicians received feedback on only one of their patients, so it did not take advantage of transfer of learning by physicians to other patients when they receive customized feedback on multiple patients (15).
However, differences in intervention format and intervention design, as well as possible mediators of change, have never been reviewed.
However, variation in intervention rates suggests that obstetric practice may not be solely driven by case criteria.
