Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(1)
Exact(2)
We do not shy away from contentious issues, and while our conversations are always respectful, we seek to encourage debate between speakers who genuinely disagree as to how we should answer the important questions of our day.
These are very different from the empirical questions pursued in the sciences, but how we answer each set of questions may have implications for how we should answer the other.
Similar(58)
To stop this rampage we should answer these questions: How do we break the automatic mental linkage between development and the automobile?
Through this process, we should answer the following questions: How are we achieving against goals?
Metaontology is concerned with pinning down what ontological claims and questions mean, and how we should go about answering the latter.
One of the discussants, Roman Yampolskiy, calls on the principle of "non-zero probability" when answering how we should prepare for AI threats: "Even a small probability of existential risk becomes very impactful once multiplied by all the people it will affect," he warns.
One of the intriguing questions that this book seeks to answer is how we should account for this difference in possibilities.
"Do you have any advice on how we should speak to trans people?" My answer is always, "As human beings".
There is no easy answer about how we should feel about the colonialism in the novel.
The answer to how we should act does not lie in the technological details of CRISPR.
This dangerous distortion of history is the wrong ANSWER to how we should be debating the issue of going to war against Iraq.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com