Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(5)
Exact(1)
He tries to show how one should read the poets in the most beneficial way.
Similar(59)
I've had a good long think about the problem of how, physically speaking, one should read the de rigueur literature of the day, and I have a suggestion to make to publishers.
At first sight it is not obvious at all how one should proceed further, but, if one reads the \(n_{i}\) and the \(c_{ij}\) as a kind of vector, then linear combinations can be formed, where \(f_{i}\) and \(g_{ij}\) are, e.g., natural or rational numbers: These two expressions can be read as functions over \(n_{i}\) and \(c_{ij}\).
Whereas science should be a free inquiry, it consists only in gibberish discussions on how we should read Aristotle or Galen.[9] Critical judgment is systematically silenced.
The last thing we need is people banging on to children about how they should read.
The combination of pictures and headlines on a page tells us how we should "read" the content.
On another show I seem to recall him stonily reading out a Sun report on the displays of wealth at Wayne Rooney's wedding, before shouting about how Wayne should read The Great Gatsby and learn a lesson or two.
That's how you should read.
I explore how banks should read business landscapes, structure operations, and adapt strategies to mitigate risks in developing economies.
This is surely how illness should read: triumphant, assertive, can-do.
(If you want to know how, you should read about neural nets and deep learning).
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com