how much time is lost

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "how much time is lost" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when discussing the amount of time that has been wasted or not utilized effectively in a particular situation. Example: "After reviewing the project timeline, we need to assess how much time is lost due to delays in communication."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Wiki

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

2 human-written examples

How much time is lost to thoughts of efficiency?

The New York Times

All one has to do is look out at the highways that we have nearby and see how much time is lost in congestion, and how much air pollution comes out of this traffic flow.

The New York Times

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

56 human-written examples

That user also has access to a "plan" page, which lets them keep tabs on who's attending and how much time is left before they lose the experience.

TechCrunch

How much time was left?

The New York Times - Health

"We don't know how much time is going to be lost in this Test match so the only real option for us was to try to enforce that follow-on".

BBC

And how much time is this?

The New York Times

How much time is enough?

The New York Times - Sports

How much time is spent managing councillors?

The Guardian

How much time is spent on View Alert training?

BMJ Open

How much time is up to you.

WikiHow

How much time are you losing every week looking for your child's cuddly toy before they go to bed? Meet Oliba, a smart toy tracker that has a few tricks up its sleeve.

TechCrunch

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When analyzing project timelines or daily routines, quantify "how much time is lost" to identify areas for improvement and increased efficiency.

Common error

Avoid using "how much time is lost" when you actually mean 'missing time'. 'Lost time' refers to time wasted or used ineffectively, while 'missing time' implies time that cannot be accounted for or is absent from a record.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "how much time is lost" functions as an interrogative phrase used to inquire about the quantity of time that has been wasted or ineffectively used. As Ludwig AI points out, it is grammatically correct and usable.

Expression frequency: Common

Frequent in

News & Media

40%

Science

30%

Wiki

15%

Less common in

Formal & Business

5%

Reference

5%

Encyclopedias

5%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "how much time is lost" is a grammatically correct and commonly used interrogative phrase to inquire about wasted time, suitable for various communication contexts. As Ludwig AI confirms, its usage is valid and understandable. While variations like "how much time is wasted" exist, the core meaning remains consistent: assessing the quantity of time used ineffectively. By understanding its function, purpose, and suitable contexts, you can effectively incorporate this phrase into your writing and speech.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

How much time gets wasted?

Replaces "is lost" with "gets wasted", emphasizing the passive nature of time being unused.

How much time goes to waste?

Rephrases "is lost" as "goes to waste", indicating a lack of productive use.

How much time is squandered?

Uses "squandered" instead of "lost" to emphasize the negative aspect of wasting time.

What is the amount of time squandered?

Substitutes "how much time" with "what is the amount of time" and "is lost" with "squandered", adding a stronger sense of misuse.

What is the time wasted?

Focuses directly on identifying the time that has been ineffectively used.

How much time vanishes?

Uses "vanishes" to suggest the time disappears without any tangible benefit.

How much time is unproductive?

Highlights the lack of productivity during the specified time period.

What quantity of time is not utilized effectively?

Replaces "how much time" with "what quantity of time" and emphasizes the inefficient use of the time period.

How much time elapses without progress?

Focuses on the lack of forward movement during the time in question.

What portion of time remains unutilized?

Focuses on the segment of time that is not put to any practical application.

FAQs

What's a good way to ask about wasted time?

Instead of asking "how much time is lost", you could inquire about "how much time is wasted" or "what is the time wasted" to emphasize inefficiency.

Is it correct to say 'how much time was lost' instead of 'how much time is lost'?

Yes, both are grammatically correct, but they refer to different time frames. "How much time is lost" refers to time lost in general or in an ongoing situation, while 'how much time was lost' refers to a specific past event.

How can I rephrase "how much time is lost" to sound more formal?

In a formal context, consider using "what is the amount of time squandered" or "what quantity of time is not utilized effectively" instead of "how much time is lost".

What's the difference between saying "how much time is lost" and "how much time are we losing"?

The phrase "how much time is lost" generally refers to the total amount of time that has been wasted. Whereas, "how much time are we losing" suggests an ongoing process of time being wasted, implying a continuous and possibly preventable loss.