Anyway, I was going to write about how we must examine and change inflammatory rhetoric, especially as used by public officials in this highly polarized and economically insecure time in our nation.
We examine how uncertainty, both about students and the context in which they are taught, remains a persistent condition of teachers' work in high-poverty, urban schools.
In this article, we examine how these researchers' discoveries about snap judgments can help you make more rational, thoughtful decisions in negotiation, practice effective communication skills, and encourage your counterparts to do the same.
To decide how best to calculate how much students learned about natural selection, we examined the intercorrelations among pre- and posttest scores and four possible calculations of learning gains: effect size (Cohen's d), average normalized gain, percent change, and raw change (Table 1).
Second, we examined how conclusions about arthropod diversity vary with level of taxonomic resolution.
But how about examining the rise of narcissism?
How about examining the civil service and Qangos and what they're actually doing when they're not giving out press releases.
(Kayla, acupuncture patient, Tucson) In addition to examining the ways in which participants articulated their expectations of CAM treatments, we examined how they talked about expectations regarding treatment outcomes.
Third, observation bias is possible, particularly if observers differ in terms of their explanations to patients of how to perform the test, how they ask about symptoms, and how they examine the patient.
Or how about examining which practices at charter and traditional public schools lead to better educational outcomes that can be broadly replicated?
This technique taught students how to examine, think about, and understand these results, which they apply significantly better than traditional students.
