hold absolute prerogatives

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "hold absolute prerogatives" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used in contexts where one is discussing the complete and unrestricted rights or privileges held by an individual or group. Example: "As the CEO, she holds absolute prerogatives over the company's strategic decisions."

✓ Grammatically correct

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

60 human-written examples

Wherever male cultural leaders hold absolute and unscrutinised power, women and children will be abused.

The Guardian - Opinion

The the United Arab Emirates' seven emirates are overseen by hereditary rulers who hold absolute power.

The New York Times - Arts

But they didn't hold absolute power.

Los Angeles Times

The board of directors holds absolute power under the law.

The Guardian

Ctrip, though, holds absolute advantage in more premium offerings such as five-star hotels.

Forbes

Valencia said the country would respond to the lawsuit and that it had the "absolute prerogative and right" to protect its offices, workers and Assange himself inside its embassy.

The Guardian

Hold tight, Absolute!

The Guardian - TV & Radio

The Zephyrs hold the absolute endurance record for un-refuelled aeroplanes.

BBC

The opposition holds an absolute majority.

The Economist

He will begin his second term with his own party holding an absolute congressional majority.

The New York Times

The most the American military can confirm is that no group holds an absolute majority.

The New York Times

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Use the phrase "hold absolute prerogatives" to denote unrestricted and inherent rights or powers, particularly in formal contexts such as legal or political discussions.

Common error

Avoid using "hold absolute prerogatives" in everyday conversation or casual writing. It sounds overly formal and can be replaced with simpler alternatives like "have full control" or "possess complete authority".

Linguistic Context

The phrase "hold absolute prerogatives" functions as a descriptor, denoting the possession of unrestricted rights or powers. Ludwig AI confirms its usability, pointing to contexts involving male cultural leaders holding absolute power, for example.

Expression frequency: Missing

Frequent in

Science

0%

News & Media

0%

Formal & Business

0%

Less common in

Science

0%

News & Media

0%

Formal & Business

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "hold absolute prerogatives" signifies the possession of ultimate, unrestricted rights or powers. While grammatically sound and identified as usable by Ludwig, its actual usage is infrequent, making it sound quite formal. Suitable alternatives include "possess ultimate authority" or "exercise supreme power", depending on the context. Ludwig examples demonstrate its relevance in discussions about leadership and political authority, predominantly within a formal register.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

possess ultimate authority

Focuses on authority rather than inherent rights.

exercise supreme power

Emphasizes the action of using power, rather than the possession of it.

wield absolute control

Highlights the control aspect, suggesting a direct influence.

retain unrestricted rights

Focuses on the legal aspect of holding rights without limitations.

maintain complete discretion

Highlights the freedom of decision-making.

have unlimited jurisdiction

Implies legal or administrative power within a specific domain.

enjoy full autonomy

Emphasizes independence and self-governance.

command total dominance

Suggests a position of superiority and influence.

lay claim to ultimate entitlements

Focuses on asserting rights or privileges.

assert plenary powers

Implies the ability to take actions without external limitations.

FAQs

How can I use "hold absolute prerogatives" in a sentence?

You can use "hold absolute prerogatives" to describe someone or some entity possessing unrestricted rights or powers, especially in formal or legal contexts. For example: "As the CEO, she "possesses ultimate authority" over strategic decisions".

What's a simpler way to say "hold absolute prerogatives"?

Alternatives include "have full control", "possess complete authority", or "exercise supreme power", depending on the nuance you want to convey.

Is "hold absolute prerogatives" commonly used?

The phrase "hold absolute prerogatives" is not very common. Simpler and more direct alternatives are often preferred in modern usage.

What is the difference between "hold absolute prerogatives" and "retain unrestricted rights"?

"Hold absolute prerogatives" emphasizes the inherent right to exercise power, while "retain unrestricted rights" focuses on maintaining existing rights without limitations. The former is broader, while the latter is more specific to legal or entitlement contexts.