Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(60)
We history match field water and gas rates using the dynamic model.
This approach is easy to implement, and also helps achieve an effective global history match.
The parameters varied during the history match include porosity and permeability.
The first stage history match is for tuning the numerical model; the second stage history match is for estimating gas loss from the production blowout of well K-140.
The reasonable history match between the simulated and observed heads demonstrated feasibility of this high-efficient calibration framework.
Furthermore, relative permeability parameters are correctly estimated, history match is improved, and uncertainty of the model parameters is reduced.
The obtained results show better history match with the field data, thus verifying the significance of the designed approach.
Because the history match is non-unique, the forecast production profiles are therefore uncertain, although this uncertainty is not usually quantified.
Such an improved scheme utilizes a set of locally varying deformation parameters to guide the iterative updating process in order to obtain a global history match.
Further analysis is conducted by using detailed geological and reservoir models and a history match of the CSS and SIGD operations.
The strength of the method in performance prediction is demonstrated by using an upscaled model to history match fine scale data.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com