Exact(56)
Ruff works mightily to sustain his premise.
His premise 1 is reasonably accurate.
He uses brain research to support his premise.
But readers shouldn't infer that I agree with his premise.
Mr. Brooks might want to reconsider his premise.
He also admits that his premise was improbable, though not impossible: executions are rarely botched.
Agree with his premise or not, it was a fair matter to raise.
He has charts to back up his premise about academic success, but how is success measured?
His premise is that no event or object is ever experienced in perfect, objective isolation.
Sceptics agree with his premise, but scoff that innovation and autocracy do not mix.
And I'll bet you most Americans wouldn't agree with his premise, either.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com