Sentence examples for highly unrepresentative of from inspiring English sources

It's as if the media collectively pauses a moment to say, Actually, the lazy Beltway media terms like "centrist" that we use to describe the values of people in safe six-figure salaries near the locus of American power are actually highly unrepresentative of the average American's interests.

Thus, the range of conditions in both protected and unprotected oak savannas at present are highly unrepresentative of historical conditions.

For example, although there is considerable interest in the analysis of Twitter content to monitor aspects of behavior such as suicide risk (Jashinsky et al. 2014) or the stigma of schizophrenia (Joseph et al. 2015), the Twitter user population is highly unrepresentative of the US population (Mislove et al. 2011).

Another symbolic element of the site is that, while close to many financial institutions, it lies just outside the area administered by the very wealthy – and, activists claim, highly unrepresentative – Corporation of London, in Hackney, one of the UK's most deprived boroughs.

It might also be due to the highly unrepresentative nature of WHI enrollees in terms of age and time since menopause.

It's a time of nearly unlimited money in politics, with the vast majority of it coming from a homogeneous and highly unrepresentative segment of society.

"To allow the policy question of same-sex marriage to be considered and resolved by a select, patrician, highly unrepresentative panel of nine is to violate a principle even more fundamental than no taxation without representation: no social transformation without representation".

Last June, when the court issued its decision in Obergefell v. Hodges, upholding the right of same-sex couples to marry, he excoriated his fellow justices, "a select, patrician, highly unrepresentative panel of nine," for violating "a principle even more fundamental than no taxation without representation: no social transformation without representation".

"And to allow the policy question of same-sex marriage to be considered and resolved by a select, patrician, highly unrepresentative panel of nine is to violate a principle even more fundamental than no taxation without representation: no social transformation without representation," he writes.

He criticized the Court's decision recognizing same-sex marriage because "To allow the policy question of same-sex marriage to be considered and resolved by a select, patrician, highly unrepresentative panel of nine is to violate a principle even more fundamental than no taxation without representation: no social transformation without representation".

"And to allow the policy question of same-sex marriage to be considered and resolved by a select, patrician, highly unrepresentative panel of nine is to violate a principle even more fundamental than no taxation without representation: no social transformation without representation".