Sentence examples for highly significant support from inspiring English sources
Conditional regression analysis of our data provided highly significant support for an independent effect for the −308 microsatellite polymorphism.
Highly significant support is presented for the first time for the monophyly of the phasianoid clade comprising Numididae, Odontophoridae and Phasianidae.
In accordance with the human-specificity of the Ser38Gly polymorphism, branch-site analysis (codeml) provides highly significant support (p-value = 0.01) for the branch-site test of positive selection across the human foreground.
The shaded clades have highly significant supports (Anisimova and Gascuel, 2006 ).
Despite these limitations, the overlap between the methods was highly significant, supporting reproducible enrichment of targets of such modification as detected by both methods.
For example, the gag sequences of prototypical XMLVs (MTCR), EMLVs (AKV, BM5eco), and PMLVs (MCF1233) clustered together with highly significant bootstrap support (Fig. 2a).
In the Sp1 c2h2-type zinc-finger protein family a significant internal branch (98% bootstrap support) separated: (I) a cluster containing the vertebrate SP1, SP2, SP3, and SP4 genes showing a topology of the form (A)(BCD), i.e. (Hsa17)(Hsa12 Hsa2 Hsa7) that grouped with a homolog from sea urchin with highly significant bootstrap support, i.e. 98%.
In this case, the observed correlations were a uniformly highly statistically significant support: all P values were <0.000001.
By adjusting for time since last meal (minutes) and blood glucose levels available from the clinical chemistry panel, the observed elevation remains highly significant (see Supporting Information, Figure S3).
This highly significant correlation supports our view that iron accumulations in the brains of fetuses and newborns could be due to maternal methemoglobinemia, in all likelihood an effect of oxidants in cigarette smoke.
The disproportional distribution of far advanced stages (cancers with > 4 involved lymph nodes) in the prevalence screen < age 50 years is highly significant and supports the doubts concerning correct randomisation.
