Sentence examples for highly significant difference observed from inspiring English sources

Although the difference in number of males courting females across treatments was just non-significant (p = 0.053) during the Female Experience trials, the pattern is consistent with a highly significant difference observed during the Search and Choose trials (below).

There was a highly significant difference observed in the glucose and xylose yield obtained for positively charged fractions F+ compared to negatively charged fractions F– and starting material F0.

The highly significant differences observed clearly demonstrate that the apparently normal mucosa of patients presenting with tumours or polyps has undergone epigenetic changes associated with the emergence of focal lesions elsewhere in the mucosal field.

As expected, the forwards had a substantially larger body mass than the back line, with highly significant differences observed in height, weight and measures of neck and chest circumference (p < 0.002).

These highly significant differences observed among control and patient groups at the genotypic level were also visible at the allelic level [Table 1] as D allele was found in a frequency of 0.2 among controls and was more than double among patients as its frequency was found to be 0.45 (p = 0.0001; OR = 3.362; 95%CI = 2.3-4.8 2.3-4.8

Although the number of patients was small (n = 5), the comparison of paired marked and control (unmarked) tissue from the same patient and the highly statistically significant differences observed does add weight to the findings of this preliminary study.

* P < 0.1 ** P < 0.05 *** P < 0.01 ref = reference category Note: Additional variables for workers' country of residence and occupational earnings were included in the model, with generally highly statistically significant differences observed (results not presented, due in part to differences in currency scales across countries).

A highly significant difference was observed between the general population sample, the pain clinic and the primary care sample for MIDAS scores (P value = 0.0005) but not for the PHQ9 depressive disorder estimate (Table 5).

In contrast, a highly significant difference was observed for CD5+ (P = 0.0004) and CD8+(P<0.0001) cells.

Further, while there was no significant difference in the CAG allele distribution patterns between the two abortion categories of our study, a highly significant difference was observed for CAG alleles with biallelic mean ≥21 repeats when these groups were separately compared with the controls.

A highly significant difference was observed between the mean of IgG1 2a ratio in resistant and susceptible mice (Mann Whitney U test, p < 0.0001, Figure  1B).