Sentence examples for highly significant detection from inspiring English sources
After performing systematic tests carefully, I find a highly significant detection of the CMASS weak lensing signal with signal-to-noise ratio of 28.
The Kullback-Leibler (KL) distance between histograms of wavelet coefficients for selected IRAS patches and corresponding random phase realizations is found to give a highly significant detection of the non-Gaussianity.
In addition, the combined analysis of the two markers proved to be highly significant in the detection of colorectal polyps with a sensitivity and specificity reaching 71% and 95%, respectively, for the detection of advanced precancerous colorectal lesions.
We did not detect TCPy in infant urine, but all other biomarkers showed a highly significant decrease in detection frequencies (χ = 7.8 34.0, p ≤ 0.005) and mean ranks (p ≤ 0.006, Kruskal Wallis) among subjects enrolled in 2003 2004 compared with those enrolled in 2001 2002.
Most strikingly, HRV-C had a highly significant effect on detection frequencies of RSV and other respiratory viruses.
Consistent with the trends we found with chlorpyrifos in the indoor and personal air samples and with TCPy in maternal urine samples, we found a highly significant difference in detection frequencies and mean ranks by year of enrollment.
The presence of active inflammation at baseline (in 46 of 96 patients) was found to be a highly significant predictor of early detection of LGD, HGD, or EAC.
However, we saw a highly significant decrease in the detection frequency and mean ranks of all of the other biomarkers among subjects enrolled during years 2001 2004.
McNemar test for paired observations showed highly significant differences of the detection frequency between both methods as a whole (P < 0.0001).
The highly significant increase in the detection of high-grade adenomas starting in 93 is due to the increased experience of the established endoscopists in Luxembourg since the late eighties.
In 88.1% of all examined samples (n = 52, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 77.1 - 95.1%) the two diagnostic methods rendered differing results, and the McNemar test for paired observations showed highly significant differences of the detection frequency (P < 0.0001).
