Sentence examples for highly incorrect from inspiring English sources

Students' conceptual knowledge is highly incorrect because of confusion with preexisting knowledge acquired in daily life resulting in scientific misconceptions (Reif 1987).

Students' conceptual knowledge was found to be highly incorrect because of confusion with preexisting knowledge acquired in daily life resulting in scientific misconceptions.

Even though rare overall, these highly incorrect reports may be particularly worrying if the likelihood of this type of misreporting differs systematically by other factors that may be of interest in an analysis.

Second, in addition to many small inaccuracies in reports of partner ages three-quarters of individuages three-quartersrs' ages that fell within 2 years of the age individualsreportedta set—a small partnerson of pageser age reporthatas highly incorrect.

Highly confident incorrect answers at the vertices and along the line between the two incorrect answers are highly penalized, while incorrect answers along the sides of the triangle connected to the correct answer are only marginally penalized, relative to the points received for answering the question correctly with high confidence.

In addition to Oasis500, I also visited Kharabeesh.com, a popular new site that is helping young Arabs produce their own cartoons and content for YouTube and for its own platform — some of it highly politically incorrect.

People like to feel good about themselves, and discovering that a belief that they highly value is incorrect makes people feel bad about themselves.

members," Leonard said, "we discover the features that may at first seem to educated writers like the prosecution to be randomly incorrect, highly idiosyncratic features were not random at all but systemic features of the B.G.F.

It is a period of consensus and this period is called unsafe period as most of the reads that occur in this period are likely to be incorrect (highly probable).

Finally, although initial test performance in the confidence-weighted multiple-choice condition in Experiment 2 is numerically lower than that observed in Experiment 1 (M = 4.82 and 4.16), we believe this difference is due to the large variability in the scores, which is greatly affected by marking even a single highly confident but incorrect answer.

However, the addition of more sequence data without concomitantly increasing the sampled taxa can lead to strong systematic biases, producing highly supported, but incorrect or misleading topologies [ 53].