The highlighted values indicate the P-values (conditional on model selection) used in the original analysis, The Bonferroni approach would give identical results at a critical value of P < 0.025 for the E and U tests, but we note that the test used previously does over-state the significance.
Significant P-values are highlighted in bold.
Significant p-values are highlighted in yellow.
P-values <0.05 highlighted in bold.
Significant co-enrichment p-values are highlighted yellow; significant intensity p-values, which may signify cross-hybridization, are highlighted red.
Significant p-values are highlighted in bold : data not normally distributed and log10- transformed for analysis.
Nominally significant P-values are highlighted in bold and the respective odds ratio (OR) and 95% CI are indicated.
Nominally significant P-values are highlighted in bold and the respective odds ratio and 95% CI are indicated.
Nominally significant P-values are highlighted in bold and the respective odds ratios and 95% CI are indicated for the adjusted model.
Significant p-values are highlighted in bold Overall, the 5-year survival rates showed significant differences between UICC stages I and II (p = 0.0001) and between stages I and III (p = 0.0002, Table 2).
