Changes are highlighted in yellow in the manuscript The manuscript by Faure et al reports an intriguing observation of a novel conserved putative ORF in the antisense orientation of the mitochondrial and alphaproteobacterial cox1 genes.
Overall, phylogenetic and synteny analysis revealed that our SUP05 phages are quite different from the one highlighted in the Anantharaman manuscript (probably due to the fact that hydrothermal vent SUP05 are distinct from OMZ SUP05).
Therefore, HABP 4044 peptide analogues modified in critical RBC binding residues identified by glycine analogue screening (highlighted in bold types throughout the manuscript), were synthesized according to the rules mentioned above [17].
This abnormality is only highlighted by the authors later on in the manuscript, when describing adult/mature hair bundle.
6) The manuscript refers to eIF2 phosphorylation and translational control, as highlighted in the title, but there were no experiments establishing cause/effect between eIF2 phosphorylation and the translation expression of a gene.
The new appendix is a good addition to the manuscript, although I don't fully follow why "open.Rprofile" is highlighted as code?
Each manuscript was read and the emerging themes and key points were highlighted.
A summary of the methods discussed above and example applications of these methods in landmark manuscripts are provided in Table 2.> -wrap-foot> *Summary of innovative methods, applications and literature reviews as highlighted in the main text.
Exons are highlighted green.
