Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(1)
The highest ovitrap positivity was 78%% (76 79 %) in SA2, while the lowest one was 38%% (36 38 %) in SA8.
Similar(59)
Differently from other ovitrap surveys, the studied dataset consisted of a high density of traps placed at close distances, and surveyed very frequently.
This result is important to guide the implementation of ovitrap surveillance systems, but also presents a challenge due to the high sampling effort required.
Next highest?
Each sample station consisted of one ovitrap placed in a sheltered site shaded by vegetation.
The water in the ovitrap was frequently checked for hatched mosquito larvae and/or pupae, and Bti: Bacilus thuringhiensis var.
However, the most commonly used ovitrap, the CDC gravid trap, is not appropriate for capturing Ae. albopictus [15], [16].
At each site, samples included larval collections from containers around households, standard ovitrap collections with 10 traps at each site, or both larval and ovitrap collections.
Eggs were collected with an ovitrap and hatched into larvae (9 ).
Ovitrap sampling and mosquito rearing were performed generally as reported previously [ 33].
The remaining SAs presented ovitrap positivities varying between 55 and 67%% (Table 2).
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com