The phrase "highest level of generalization" is correct and can be used in written English.
You can use this phrase to refer to the most abstract or vague way of describing or understanding a concept or idea. For example, you might say, "Our discussion of the issue did not move beyond the highest level of generalization."
The objectivist, thereby can accommodate diversity and lack of agreement at this higher level of generalization (see Philippa Foot (1982) for this type of argument) More moderate forms of normative moral relativism, positions that sometimes are characterized as moral pluralism, have been defended by David Wong (2006) and David Velleman (2013).
Moreover, while it is possible to capture answers in an XML format, our approach can simply be transferred to other domains of knowledge by defining the appropriate DTD to a particular exam, achieving in this manner a high level of generalization.
After all, generalization may occur at the price of abstracting from details, and the account of navigation in terms of simple taxis or tropisms could be extrapolated from invertebrates to rodents, thus yielding a higher level of generalization.
Together, both tests suggest that generalization to a higher level of abstraction, featuring previously unseen combinations of elements, occurred based solely on specific instantiations of the sound classes heard during the exposure.
It is observed that, when compared with other DDA-based networks, FAMDDA-T is able to form a parsimonious network structure and, at the same time, to maintain a high level of network generalization in tackling pattern classification problems.
Participants who reached a high level of accuracy during training showed a generalization pattern consistent with an opposites rule, while participants that performed less well on the trained patterns showed a generalization pattern consistent with featural overlap.
So if there is a generalization at the higher level of description available for capturing (and in the pedestrian example there surely is), an exclusively reductionist approach to psychological explanation will miss it.
Results show a higher than 97% level of generalization in all the designed experiments.
