Exact(16)
The fact that the mothers who breastfed the shortest had the highest distress scores, could indicate that mothers who felt distressed discontinued breastfeeding.
Highest distress was found in patients with 'other therapies'.
Patients with nonmalignant diseases show the highest distress scores.
The highest distress scores were 'limitations in everyday activities' for males and 'anxiety/worries' for females.
Patients who asked for psychosocial support or who were recruited by the medical staff showed the highest distress scores.
Patients with nonmalignant diseases (81% autoimmune diseases or hereditary hemochromatosis) showed the highest distress level of 5.2.
Similar(44)
Individual coping strategies and significant life events like death or marriage can all lead to higher distress levels, but some of the sources of distress among current residents may also be related to larger societal shifts.
Cases with high distress and high impairment (Kessler-10 score >30, WSAS score >20) formed the largest group comprising 39% of this sample, with just under a third of the sample classified in the high distress/low impairment (15%) or low distress/high impairment (14%) groups and the remainder (32%) categorised as having low distress/low impairment (see Table 1).
Andrade and Kaplan (1998) pursue this argument by concluding that economic shocks drive higher distress costs, significantly influencing the chosen strategy's effectiveness.
Post hoc analysis shows that the high impairment/distress group is significantly older than both low impairment groups; the high impairment/low distress group is also significantly older than the two low impairment sub-groups (age of high distress groups do not differ significantly; ditto for the low impairment groups).
Andrade and Kaplan (1998) find slightly higher distress costs of 10%to20%0% for US firms, and Almeida and Philippon (2007) calculate a net present value of distress of 4.5% of pre-distress value.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com