Sentence examples for higher warmth from inspiring English sources

The Bonferroni post hoc contrasts revealed significantly higher Warmth only in the contrast of the 'no-change' and 'changed' group (Δ z = +.65 cl95 ±.45, p =.003).

Unlike temperate regions where higher warmth of the city is beneficial in winter, it is a significant thermal heat stress risk in hot humid environments like Akure.

Testing the association between individual-level 'change' categories and score level within dimensions showed that the most stable group for Warmth was characterized by significantly higher Warmth scores (F 2,140) = 5.97, MSE = 1.62, p =.003).

Mothers reported significantly higher Warmth than fathers at both T1 and T2 by.06-.07 .06-.07 GLM analySDs (F(1/146) = 19.85, MSE = 10.03, p <.001), but no dinference for Protectiveness and Authoritarianism.

Contrary to our expectations, high criticism did not predict high oppositionality ratings but high warmth predicted low scores instead.

The four parenting styles are determined by parents' position along two spectra: low vs. high warmth and low vs. high control [ 15].

A significant prediction could only be obtained for ADHD children with the EE sub-measure of high warmth predicting low oppositionality ratings (R =.271, F 1,56) = 4.45, p =.039).

The term "parental rearing style" was first formulated in 1959 by Schaefer, who proposed four parental styles: authoritative (high warmth and low control), overprotective (high warmth and high control), authoritarian (affective coldness and high control) and neglecting (affective coldness and low control) [ 31].

However, mothers' "overprotection and over-interference" and fathers' "punishing" were not significant in predicting students' critical thinking disposition, which indicates that high warmth and high control by fathers as well psychological [mental] and bodily punishment by mothers has a negative effect on students' critical thinking disposition.

Fluent speakers appear to perceive PWS as being likeable individuals who are poor communicators, a combination of high-warmth and low-competence that elicits pity and passive harm from listeners according to social psychologists (Cuddy et al., 2008).

We determined, for example, that if AU4, AU5, and AU6 are present at high levels, warmth can be predicted with very high accuracy, while if AU4, AU5, and AU23 are present at high levels, dominance can be predicted with over 85% accuracy.