Suggestions(1)
Exact(1)
However, as in Experiment 1, this relationship reversed at the fifth confidence bin: hits (mean.95, SE.01) were significantly higher than correct rejections (mean.84, SE.03, p < .001).001
Similar(59)
Since erroneous contigs in high-depth regions may have higher depths than correct contigs in low-depth regions, short (< l) and relatively low-depth contigs are likely to be erroneous and can be removed.
"Higher interval" indicates that the predicted interval is higher than a correct interval of a drug side effect incidence.
Rats successfully learned this task, achieving a performance higher than 70% correct in about 12 training sessions, thus showing the capability to concurrently process multiple constituent parts of visual objects.
Correction to: British Journal of Cancer (2012) 104, 1482 1486; doi: 10.1038/bjc.2011.114 After publication, it was noted that the dose category labels contained in Table 4 of this paper were presented at magnitude 100 times higher than was correct.
For example, the mention 'ptosis' refers to a drooping of the eyelid, but the method ranked 'X-linked ptosis' (OMIM 300245) higher than the correct annotation of 'eyelid ptosis' (MESH D001763).
The base composition drive is supported in each case of a reciprocal G/C to A/T pair, in that the corrected forward rate (G/C to A/T) is higher than the corrected reverse rate (A/T to G/C) downstream of nucleocyclic TSSs, yielding the small increase in A/T incidences and decrease in G/C incidences shown in Fig. 3a.
In Experiment 2, the overall proportion correct for correct rejections was higher than the proportion correct for hits, and the confidence-accuracy relationship for hits was steeper than it was for correct rejections.
In the northern hemisphere, GPS stations located higher than 55N Corrected Geomagnetic Latitude (CGL) at different longitudes were selected.
Pairwise comparisons revealed that in the first two confidence bins, the proportion correct for correct rejections was significantly higher than the proportion correct for hits (p s < .05).05
Overall, the proportion correct for correct rejections (mean.70, SE.02) was higher than the proportion correct for hits (mean.62, SE.01), F 1,63) = 29.44, p < .001, η2 p = .32.32
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com