Exact(1)
On the inactive lever, where responding was still much less overall than at the previously nicotine-paired lever, an overall extinction pattern was also observed (day: F2,72 = 8.7, P < 0.001) with Sham rats tending to have higher responding than NVHLs on day 1 that habituated significantly more compared to NVHLs over the 3 days (day × lesion: F2,72 = 5.5, P < 0.01) (Fig. 5c).
Similar(59)
The CI prior to each fluid loading step was higher in responding than non-responding steps in the low GEF group, but lower in the near-normal GEF group (Table 3).
When GEF was low, GEDVI was higher prior to responding than non-responding fluid loading steps, while GEDVI in the near-normal GEF group did not differ prior to fluid loading steps.
Indeed, GEDVI was higher prior to responding than to non-responding steps according to CI ≥10% increases when GEF was low (7 of 9 [77%] responding steps had a baseline GEDVI >850 mL/m).
Alcohol-dependent rats exhibited higher operant alcohol responding than non-dependent rats when infused with vehicle, but responding was similar in the two groups following infusion of all doses of NPY.
C57BL/6J mice displayed higher impulsivity (more premature responding) than C57BL/6JOlaHsd mice when the pre-stimulus waiting interval was increased in the 5-CSRTT.
Indeed, self-administration studies have shown that AMPH engenders greater responding than cocaine on higher order schedules of reinforcement, which require strong cue-reward associations, while cocaine engenders greater consummatory behaviors than AMPH.
The OPRT/DPD ratios were statistically higher in responding tumours than in nonresponding ones and patients with high OPRT/DPD ratio tumours survived longer than those with low ratio tumours.
That is, participants characterized as high IMAT and a higher BMI responded differently than those whose initial levels of IMAT were low.
The data available for non-participants showed that the proportion of patients who suffered more clinically severe stroke events (ischemic and hemorrhagic stroke) was higher among those unable to respond than it was among participants.
Prior to fluid loading, GEDVI (and CI) was higher in responding (1007 ± 306 mL/m) than non-responding steps (870 ± 236 mL/m) when GEF was low (P = 0.002), but did not differ when GEF was near-normal.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com