Sentence examples for higher reasoning from inspiring English sources
Within inquiry instruction, low reasoners had higher reasoning gains within homogeneous groups than heterogeneous groups (n = 3, Mhomogeneous = 8.67; n = 9, Mheterogeneous = 2.67, F = 5.22, p = 0.03).
Within didactic instruction, low reasoners had higher reasoning gains within heterogeneous groups (n = 5, Mhomogeneous = 2.20; n = 12, Mheterogeneous = 6.00; F = 3.39, p = 0.08; note: differences were almost significant).
Within inquiry instruction, low reasoners had much higher reasoning transfer scores when placed in homogeneous groups (n = 3, Mhomogeneous = 4.00; n = 9, Mheterogeneous = 1.89; F = 6.78, p = 0.02; see Table 3).
In addition, they found that, when high reasoners were placed in heterogeneous groups, lower reasoners tended to stop participating and allowed the higher reasoning student(s) to do all of the work.
Consistent with equilibration theory, within inquiry instruction, low reasoners made significantly greater reasoning gains and had significantly higher reasoning transfer scores when placed in homogeneous groups.
The unconscious one is simpler, more fundamental, and linked to emotional processing rather than higher reasoning.
In fact, within the inquiry sections, the two highest reasoning gains were seen in two low reasoners placed within a single homogeneous group.
For high reasoning levels the cognitive adequacy of representation and reasoning techniques is a major issue, while for lower reasoning levels the adequacy wrt. the modelled domain is important.
Surely endoscopic skills also demand high reasoning ability, memory ability, etc., from its practitioners!
Heterogeneous groups consisted of at least one student with low reasoning ability and at least one student with high reasoning ability.
LCA identified three parental hostility groups based on their frequency of harsh discipline, and three parental control groups defined as high reasoning (highest frequency of reasoning and most choice), medium reasoning (less frequent reasoning and limited choice), and low reasoning (least frequent reasoning and limited choice).
