Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(1)
Exact(1)
CRR's focus on ratings overall may theoretically have an impact on ITV's programme commissioning – towards higher rating programmes – but that is historically what ITV has done anyway.
Similar(59)
CSI: Miami on Five was the third highest rated programme, with 2.6 million and 11%, the channel's best audience of the day.
It also became the 17th highest rated programme ever for Sky1.
This made the episode the second highest rated programme of the day, behind Britain's Got Talent on ITV1.
Mad Dogs opened with 1.61 million viewers, the 17th highest rated programme ever for Sky1, and attracted positive reactions from critics.
It was watched by 4.54 million people on its initial airing, attaining a 15.9% audience share and becoming BBC Three's highest rated programme ever, as well as the most-watched multichannel programme of the day.
EastEnders Live: The Aftermath drew 4.3 million viewers and a 15.9% audience share, becoming BBC Three's highest rated programme ever, as well as the most-watched multichannel programme of the day.
Based on effectiveness data (which indicated high rates of programme uptake, improvement of assessment skills, as well as satisfaction with the training) they estimated cost effectiveness ratios, using different assumptions about the potential reduction in suicide rates as result of this educational intervention.
"It has led us to chase higher-rating programmes, things like soaps and what have you.
Adam Crozier, ITV chief executive, admitted to a "remarkable lack of diversity" in ITV1's schedule compared with 10 years ago and claimed advertising airtime sales restrictions had "led us to chase higher-rating programmes, things like soaps and what have you".
(5) The higher rate of leaving the programme in the oldest age group may reflect an inappropriate choice of specialty or that older graduates, having had a past career and already made one major change, have more confidence to switch specialties than younger graduates.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com