Sentence examples for higher quality reported from inspiring English sources

However, this relationship could be endogenous, due to the cross-sectional nature of the data: it is plausible that higher quality reported by CBHI members is a result of being in the scheme, rather than a factor affecting enrolment (e.g., CBHI members may have more contact with the district hospitals or a better experience overall because they don't have to pay for health care).

Where the majority of available studies (in particular those with higher quality) reported that the intervention group had statistically favorable outcomes (such as greater satisfaction and better functioning status) compared with those of the control group, we reported in the results below that case management in community aged care interventions had significant effects on these outcome measures.

The most significant finding in this report was that "consumers who read native ads that they identified as high quality reported a significantly higher level of trust for the sponsoring brand".

Three studies (one of high quality) found statistically significant positive effects; in addition, Bakitas 2009 (high quality) reported a marginally significant effect in the same direction.

We selected journals on the basis of reputation, quality, and impact, and believe that they are likely to represent high quality reporting on health inequalities.

The Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials (CONSORT) statement [ 37, 38] will be used as a guideline for the present clinical trial in order to assure high quality reporting.

Higher quality press releases issued by medical journals were associated with higher quality reporting in subsequent newspaper stories.

This financial constraint channel suggests that higher quality reporting can alleviate firms' financial constraints and thus enable them to pay higher dividends.

There is evidence to suggest that journals using the CONSORT statement, compared to those not doing so, have higher quality reports of RCTs [ 16].

These reviewers might have been expected to spend notably more time, and give higher quality reports, on papers that they were recommending for acceptance because their reviews were more likely to be shared with the world.

He added, "What's in it for us is that we get access to a high-quality reporting staff whose focus is different from ours and whose strengths are generally where our strengths are not, and vice versa".